If you read the headlines, you probably think there is only one side to Governor Christie – brash, loud, bossy. But when you’re on the ground with him at event after event like I am, you know there are at least two sides to the man.
When Governor Christie makes an appearance, he’s very good at connecting with people. He listens and nods knowingly. If a person wants a selfie with the Governor, he’s always game. When someone says “Governor, remember me from <insert small event or meeting place>?” “Yes, of course!,” he replies.
And when I see these interactions, I have to wonder if the people will forget the headlines and remember the small talk? The answer to that question could be the difference between a successful Republican primary for the Governor, or a complete dud.
Retail politics is a phrase used regularly when talking about a politician’s ability to make personal connections with the people. Politicians can’t just shake your hand and keep walking; they have to shake your hand and then have a personal conversation with you. And when it comes to a presidential election, it is well known that retail politics matter in the state of New Hampshire.
Here’s some background: New Hampshire, a state with only four electoral votes, hosts the first in the nation primary. While the number of votes won’t sway an election, the state is still tremendously important to presidential hopefuls. New Hampshire polls and the primary results set the tone for each election cycle.
I recently visited New Hampshire to cover Governor Christie’s remarks at the Lincoln-Reagan Dinner in Concord. And while I was there, I took every opportunity to speak with the people about politics, since the state plays such a meaningful role in the selection of each President.
The majority I spoke with took an interest in and concern for the election. Most had met past presidents and presidential candidates. One shared a running joke that sums up the culture pretty well: “If you don’t meet a presidential candidate at least twice in a diner, than they’re not getting your vote.” Another told me that when a candidate comes to town, “…you can only get away with canned lines and worn out speeches for so long before somebody calls you on it.”
Before the Lincoln-Reagan dinner began, I was trying to find out what time Governor Christie would begin speaking. He was scheduled for 6:55PM, and I commented that the Governor is usually late. The woman I was speaking with responded that he better not be late; the people of New Hampshire expect and deserve more. And wouldn’t you know it, he was on time.
I had to wonder if Governor Christie made the effort to be on time because he knows it matters to the people of New Hampshire? And could he possibly think it doesn’t matter to the people of New Jersey? I regularly tweet pictures of an empty podium as I wait for the Governor to arrive at events in New Jersey. Is it possible that he focuses on a small detail like timeliness in New Hampshire more than he does elsewhere? Or was his timeliness just an accident?
A recent article in the New York Times (Critics in G.O.P. Say Chris Christie Is in a ‘Bubble’) listed arriving late amidst a host of “complaints” about the Governor. Not returning phone calls and limited thank you notes were also mentioned. And this time it had to do with potential donors.
Whether it’s a potential donor or a potential vote, you don’t need to be an expert at retail politics to know these details matter. Shaking hands and friendly conversation can only take you so far.